Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is widely accepted that increased recreational centres would help people to stay fit, whereas counterparts believe that unique ways are needed. This essay is an attempt to examine both sides of the argument without any prejudice to arrive at a sensible conclusion.
The section of society which believes that building new sports centres do not enough say that the sedentary lifestyle of people would not allow joining outdoor gaming activities. Moreover, will power is required to go for an exhausting workout, whether games or gym. In addition to this, working people are too exhausted after tiring day, and to rejuvenate spending time with family is considered over exercise. Therefore, awareness of how physical demanding activities can help people to get away from serious diseases seems to be a viable solution.
On the other hand, many are not able to find a game of their interest in a limited number of sports facilities. With increased centres options available with ample choices, people will start enrolling themselves in a game in they are interested. Moreover, expert advice by official trainers can help to learn a game more efficiently. Besides, socialising with others can help people to relieve stress and tension. Paid membership schemes will force to have regular attendance to impart training well.
in the epilogue, although the way of lifestyle tends not to join recreational facilities, and the public can be taught about deleterious effects of unhealthy living; however, I believe when enormous options of favourite activity are available, then surge in membership can be seen.
