In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career.
Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today’s world?
In some nations, Secondary schools teach all traditional subjects whereas, in other countries, they exclusively aim at teaching some key subjects that help pupils to get lucrative jobs. This essay endorses later view because it builds a foundation for tertiary education and helps in getting good jobs.
Firstly, educating only important subjects in Secondary schools assists students to get accustomed to the syllabus they are going to study in universities. Most of the subjects, such as Maths, Physics and Chemistry, in Secondary schools consist of rudimentary concepts that are part of the curriculum of higher courses. Therefore, if one learns these basics at the school level, then there is every likelihood that they will pass their graduation with flying clours. For example, a recent study found that 70% of the toppers in all the universities in India had studied only relative subjects to their discipline in Secondary schools.
Secondly, The prominent purpose of education for many is to be a success in their professional careers. The majority of students, especially in developing nations, study with a view to getting jobs with handsome salaries. Therefore, studying only a few subjects makes learners more competent in a certain field and provides them with better opportunities of getting good jobs. For example, if one starts concentrating only on one area right from Secondary school, then he stands a better chance of having a lucrative career.
In conclusion, exclusively educating a narrow range of subjects is more advantageous as it facilitates students in the learning process and helps to get a good job.
